Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The Office of Special Affairs  (Read 23460 times)
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #60 on: July 26, 2012, 08:57:59 AM »

                                         Alexander Jentzch's in-laws lawyer up..

OSA has assigned one of their private defense attorneys to represent the in-laws: Vicki Podberesky.

http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=102119
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #61 on: August 05, 2012, 07:08:29 PM »

                            SLOW NEWS DAY

                           Garry Scarff: OSA Spy?

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?28127-Garry-Scarff-OSA-Spy
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #62 on: August 09, 2012, 08:33:43 AM »

                                        Scientology's OSA RPRR 8-6-2012


Radio show on Radio Paul.
Interviewed are four people who share their personal experiences with OSA.

The Office of Special Affairs or OSA (formerly the Guardian's Office) is a department of the Church of Scientology. According to the Church, the OSA is responsible for directing legal affairs, public relations, pursuing investigations, publicizing the Church's "social betterment works," and "oversee[ing its] social reform programs". Some observers outside the Church have characterized the department as an intelligence agency, comparing it variously to the CIA, the Secret Service, and the KGB. The department has drawn criticism for its involvement in targeting critics of the Church for dead agent operations. OSA has mounted character assassination operations against many critics of the Church.

OSA is the successor to the now-defunct Guardian's Office, which was responsible for Operation Snow White; both are in Department 20 in the Scientology Org-Chart. The most recent head of OSA International was Mike Rinder, who has since departed from the organization.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ8Z9T82qls&feature=youtu.be
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 09:29:03 AM by Ididntcomeback » Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #63 on: December 01, 2012, 07:07:28 PM »

                                    OSA Investigations "Enemy" Point System Document

I don't know if this has already been posted here, I couldn't find it. The link also has more interesting information if you are a critical thinker or a skeptic and interested in debunking the concept that Corporate Scientology is a religion, and should continue to enjoy legal protection as such.

This text is taken from Perry Scott's "The Scientology Comparative Theology Page", which has other interesting articles and items as well:

http://www.ezlink.com/~perry/CoS/Theology/index.htm

From: ronisxenu@aol.com (RonIsXenu)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: TRACK YOUR POINTS AGAINST OSA!
Date: 16 Sep 1997 21:39:23 GMT
Lines: 345
Message-ID: <19970916213901.RAA04033@ladder02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
SnewsLanguage: English

This documents how OSA is to track "enemies" via a point system. How many
points can YOU rack up against OSA? Post your results! This posting and
my others have me well above 20 unhandled "points!"

-------------

INVESTIGATIONS SECTION


INVESTIGATIONS SECTION VFPs: 1. A FULLY ESTABLISHED,
PRODUCTIVE DSA INVEST SECTION WHICH BRINGS ABOUT THE FAILURE
OF INFLUENCE OF HOSTILE GROUPS OR PERSONS.

2. THE REQUIRED INFORMATION FURNISHED TO GUIDE THE
PROGRESS OF SCIENTOLOGY.

1. TOTAL UNHANDLED ATTACKS AND ATTACKERS (GDS)
Ref: Advice updated RE GUARD STAT
Advice 27 March 72 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS
Advice 28 March 72 INTELLIGENCE PRINCIPLES

This is a guard stat with 0 at the top.

This stat is counted:

1 point for every attacker

Plus:

1 point if the attack is local

2 points if the attack is regional

4 points if the attack is national

The points remain on the stat until handled.

The category of attacks are listed below:

1. TM infringement, each TM Infringement counted as per
the TM Infringers handled stat of Invest. (NOTE: if a
report is received of a possible TM Infringer, this must be
verfied as inactive within 4 weeks or it gets counted on
this stat as a TM Infringer until verified as inactive or
until handled.)
2. External Influences - where an org is being influenced
by External Influences and this is not handled by OSA.
Also each External Influence who has not been handled.
This would include any actions done by TM Infringers which
affect the org or the field.
3. A suit filed against a Church entity or individual.
4. Any lost suit.
5. A print media hit - a newspaper or magazine story which
is an attack.
6. An attack on the TV by an individual eg. an entheta
source who has gotten on a TV talk show to forward an
attack, or on a radio show.
7. A TV program that is an attack on the Church.
8. Legislation proposed in any area that hinders our
operations in that area.
9. Legislation passed in any area that hinders our

-page break-

operations in that area.
10. An entheta book published.
11. Any legislative or governmental inquiry initiated into
the Church.
12. Any Scientology activity closed down through
opposition actions.
13. Government restrictions imposed upon the Church.
14. A legal case not involving the Church but resulting in
a judgement that is an attack upon the Church.
15. A civil suit filed on the Church.
16. A civil judgement against the Church
17. A deprogramming attempt on a Scientologist.
18. A penal (criminal) complaint against a Church or a
staff member filed.
19. A penal (criminal) complaint against a Church or a
staff member being acted on.

For every attack, the attack goes on the stat with a point
value according to whether it is a local, regional or
national attack plus the attacker behind the attack goes on
as an additional point if not already on the list.

When the actual situation is HANDLED, by terminatedly
handling the attacker the points come off the stat (one
attacker may be behind a number of attacks and when
handled, the accumulated points for the attacks originated
from that person would all come off the stat). The
exception would be if an Attacker is verified as being
handled yet an outstanding attack still exists in some
form, that attack remains on the list until handled (while
the Attacker and any handled attacks come off the stat).

Clearly, the Attacker MUST be correctly isolated and named
before he can be handled and this stat goes up.

For purposes of calculating the list of UATTACKS to begin
with, each DSA Invest Officer should list out the major
attacks connected to each of its current attackers going back
to the point when they started attacking (in many cases this
can be several years or even a decade - for the initial
calculation of this stat it is not intended to get into a
huge administrative cycle and some approximation of attacks
based on existing file data may be necessary). Each attack
will have to be classified as to whether it was a local,
regional or national attack for purposes of calculating the
stat.

Each DSA Invest Officer is to format their UATTACKS breakdown
by listing out the names of the attackers with the attacks
under each name, with the attack designated as to whether it
was a local, regional or national attack. The attacker with
the most attacks should go at the top of the list. The
purpose of this admin system is to be able to see at a glance
who we are getting the most attacks from. If there is more
than one attacker behind an attack, then that attack would be
placed under the name of the major attacker with the name of
the second attacker in parenthesis next to the attack so it
is clear that the attack would not come off the list until
both attackers are terminatedly handled. If the major
attacker gets terminatedly handled, the attack would then be
placed under the name of the second attacker.

If there are attacks for which there are no known
attackers, these are placed at the end of the list until
the attackers behind them are known.

-page break-

Following is an example to illustrate this:

1) JOE BLOGS = 1 POINT
A) LA TIMES ENTHETA ARTICLE 15 JAN 1980 - REGIONAL
= 2 POINTS
B) ENTHETA TV APPEARANCE 1 MAY 1982 - LOCAL = 1 POINT
C) ENTHETA BOOK "CULTS" 1984 (FRED FRAME ALSO BEHIND
IT) - DISTRIBUTED NATIONALLY = 4 POINTS


Subtotal = 8 POINTS

2) FRED FRAME = 1 POINT
A) ENTHETA LECTURE BOSTON UNIV 15 DEC 1983 - LOCAL =
1 POINT
B) DEPRO ATTEMPT ON SUE SMITH MARCH 1984 - LOCAL = 1
POINT
C) 14 MEDIA ATTACKS 1976-1980 - ALL REGIONAL = 28
POINTS

Subtotal = 31

ATTACKS WITH NO KNOWN ATTACKERS:

A) 12 JUNE 1981 RAID ON MISSION - LOCAL = 1 point
B) JULY 1987 ATTEMPTED DEPROGRAMMING ON BILL SMITH -
LOCAL = 1 POINT

Subtotal = 2

Etc.


Once formatted as per the above, each DSA Invest
Officer should forward this breakdown to the OSA Cont where a
master Continental list of UATTACKS will also be kept and
updated. Each cont should have a break down the UATTACKS by
the DSA office responsible for handling each attack/attacker.


2. NUMBER OF ATTACKS PREDICTED AND REPORTED PLUS WHOS
FOUND BY APPROVED ESTIMATE OR EVAL. (GDS)

Ref: Dispatch RE: NEW STAT
OSA NW ORDER 42 INTELLIGENCE, ITS ROLE
OSA NW ORDER 35 INTELLIGENCE, ESTIMATIONS
AND PREDICTIONS
HCO PL 17 FEB 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION
Advice 28 March 72 INTELLIGENCE PRINCIPLES


This stat is a weekly point value for the total number of
threatened attacks found by Defensive minus points for
any unpredicted attack or any attack which has been
predicted which then goes unhandled and occurs despite
the prediction. The stat is not accumulative. The
points are valued as follows:

Local Attack - 1 point
Regional Attack - 5 points
National Attack - 10 points

An unpredicted attack, or unhandled predicted attack counts
minus 10 times the above point value.

An attack is defined per the definitions of an attack as
covered under the UATTACKS statistic.

-page break-

A bonus of 10 points is given for any Who found by AVC
approved evaluation and 5 points for a Who found by
approved estimate.

As can be seen, for a prediction to be viable it must be
predicted in sufficient time to handle the matter before it
becomes a full blown attack and a handling must be worked
out and exchanged. The actual handling may be executed by
Support Unit, Staff Security Sub-Unit, HCO, Dept of I&R,
Legal Off or PR Off, but the Defensive Unit is responsible
for ensuring that the prediction product is actually of
quality and exchangeable and utilized to beneficial result of
preventing the attack.

To be counted, the prediction must be reported in writing
in some manner to the proper publics who should know and/or
act on the data (which reporting may even be in the form of
a stat breakdown if it is clearly communicated in an
exchangeable manner with sufficient time, place, form and
event to be understood.)

The stat reflects external prediction as well as internal
prediction lines.

Internal prediction activities must be aligned with the
purpose and functions of the Office of Special Affairs and
Departments of Special Affairs, which are external facing
units. It is the Staff Security Sub-Unit that monitors the
prediction and handling of matters which interface between
internal and external. The Department of Special Affairs is
interested in matters which if not handled could result in
external attacks, different from security situations which
are simply an HCO matter - for example a PTS Type A situation
which just needs to get a standard handling (and would
concern us only if there are enemy connections or indicators
of something that will turn into an external attack unless
handled); whereas a PTS C found on lines would of course be
of interest to us. Valid Staff Security matters include such
things as detection and handling of enemy infiltration;
detection and handling of the source of external influences
preying on the backs of orgs, etc.

Key references on Staff Security functions and duties and
areas of prediction activity which would validly be
represented on the WHOATTACKSF stat, and which deliniate
matters which are the hat and function of HCOs are:

SPD 2 OCT 88 ORGANIZATIONAL SECURITY
SO ED 4234 HCO AND OSA COORDINATION ON SECURITY AND
INVESTIGATION MATTERS
OSA NW ORDER 42 INTELLIGENCE, ITS ROLE
OSA NW ORDER 64 RUNDOWN ON INTELLIGENCE
HCO PL 21 APRIL 70 FIELD ETHICS


3. NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING THREATS (GUARD STAT)
Ref: Advice 16 Feb 82, NEW STAT

This stat is a guard stat and is the total outstanding
threats. This would cover any predicted attack about which
information has been received. Once the threat is handled it
comes off the stat.

4. NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING SECURITY THREATS (GUARD STAT)
Ref: Advice 16 Feb 82, NEW STAT


-page break-


This stat measures the total amount of outstanding security
threats and risks and is an upside down graph with zero at
the top. A security situation for OSA/DSA is as defined
under the WHOATTACKS Found stat.

5. NUMBER OF THREATS SEEN, THREATENED OR REPORTED
Ref: Advice 16 Feb 82, NEW STAT

Per the above listed advice, this stat shows the amount of
security threats that are found and reported. A security
situation for OSA/DSA is as defined under the WHOATTACKS
Found stat.

6. NUMBER OF THREATS HANDLED

Per the above listed advice, this stat shows the amount of
threats that are handled.

7. COMPLAINTS ACTED UPON
Ref: HCO PL 17 Feb 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION:

This stats measures the number of complaints against
attackers that were acted upon by authorities.

This is defined as the number of complaints filed with
anyone who is in a position of authority and acts upon the
complaint and thus impinges on an attacker (e.g. judicial,
governmental, civil, employer, landlord, etc). Each time
the complaint is acted on counts 1. Not cumulative.

8. NUMBER OF OPPOSITION ADVANTAGES LOST
Ref: HCO PL 16 Feb 69 Iss II, BATTLE TACTICS

This stat measures the advantages of the opposition which
were lost due to the application of standard Invest tech.

Total number of advantages lost by the opposition that week
as a direct or indirect result of Invest actions. See the
above HCO PL for a description of the type of activities
that would count on this stat. Not cumulative.

DEFINITIONS:

OPPOSITION: A person or group actively opposing the
Founder, Scientology or the Church of Scientology or its
principles or activities and/or threatening its survival or
expansion.

9. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OBTAINED AND USED
Ref: HCO PL 17 Feb 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION
Advice 8 June 73 INTELLIGENCE, ITS ROLE

This stat measures the evidence that has been obtained
against attackers and was put to use.

Documented evidence obtained that indicates a crime or
useable evidence regarding a Who or an opposition terminal,
and is deemed useable by counsel, PR or Legal.

This stat is counted on the basis of one point for each
evidence of a crime documented deemed useable by counsel,
PR or Legal.

A 5 point bonus is given for each piece of documented
evidence that is USED by counsel, PR or Legal. (If the
data contained in the documented evidence is used, it can


-page break-

still be counted as a DOCEV, whether the actual document is
used or only the data.) Not cumulative.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?15560-OSA-Investigations-quot-Enemy-quot-Point-System-Document
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #64 on: December 20, 2012, 12:20:42 PM »


                                  Obsessed Stalker – David Miscavige

Posted on December 18, 2012 by mrinder | 159 Comments

Please view these two short videos shot and narrated by Mike Rinder outside his home today:

http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2012/12/18/obsessed-stalker-david-miscavige/
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #65 on: December 30, 2012, 09:36:59 PM »

                                       What Scientology Does To It's Enemies

http://nomoreliesscn.blogspot.co.nz/2012/12/what-scientology-does-to-its-enemies.html
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #66 on: February 01, 2013, 07:06:10 AM »

                          Undercover as an Agent for the Office of Special Affairs

AlanzosBlog: Deconstructing Scientology In Its Present Form

http://alanzosblog.blogspot.co.nz/2009/05/undercover-as-agent-for-office-of.html
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #67 on: February 02, 2013, 08:03:50 AM »

                  Parent gets daughter out of Scientology.. he thought.. it was an OSA op

Many here may remember Tony Leigh, a parent of a Scientologist in Manchester, England wanting to get his daughter out. He had posted a number of videos talking about his efforts to free his daughter who at the time, was engaged to be married to a Scientologist. Tony was led to believe that his daughter left the cult and she instructed him to stop posting videos critical of the cult & to stop attending protests of the cult. He, out of his love for his daughter, chose to follow those instructions.

I had many conversations with Tony about this & professed it sounded like an OSA op to handle him & his wife. Tony stopped posting videos & commenting on the boards, ESMB & WWP. I presumed that Tony, his wife Sue, and daughter Becky had re-established ties and moved on with their lives.

Now comes word that Becky's professing to leave the cult was indeed an OSA op to handle & shut Tony up. This is so heart-breaking to Tony & his wife who clearly loves their daughter & is concerned for her welfare.

                smurf.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?30367-Parent-gets-daughter-out-of-Scientology-he-thought-it-was-an-OSA-op
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #68 on: March 03, 2013, 06:38:24 PM »

This Is What a Scientology Investigative Reporter Does: Investigate People Who Report on Scientology

 A couple years ago, Scientology posted a puzzling want ad seeking "experienced investigative reporters" for its magazine, Freedom, which "covers human rights and social betterment issues and does investigative reporting in the public interest." What kind of stories would these reporters be investigating? We got an answer that the mission includes digging up dirt on Scientology's critics.

On Friday, Freedom reporter James Lynch sent an email to Foster Kamer, a blogger who used to work for the Village Voice, asking for information for a profile of  Tony Ortega, the former editor of the Village Voice who has since focused primarily on criticizing the Church of Scientology. Lynch's first question: "Do you know any reasons for Ortega's obsessive interest in and incessant blogging about Scientology?"

We don't know Ortega's reasons, but let us try to answer that one: The rise of Scientology is an effing fascinating story, and fascinating stories are what real reporters like to write about. The Church has been working to rehabilitate its image recently, following the publication of Lawrence Wright's book Going Clear, a history of Scientology's packed with fascinating details, including, just to name a few off the top of my head, the Church's maybe-accidental involvement with a Moroccan coup, slave labor camps, and current leader David Miscavige's ritualized humiliation of its clergy. It's is not a flattering portrait.

Scientology's used to scare away reporters mainly with lawsuits. In the 1970s, Scientology sued Paulette Cooper, author of The Scandal of Scientology, 19 times. In the early 1990s, it sued Time Warner for $416 million over an unflattering Time cover story. It cost the company $3.7 million in legal fees. Wright's book isn't for sale in the U.K. because it's easier to sue for libel there.

Not to diminish Ortega, but he is probably a less fascinating story than Scientology. We asked Ortega for comment; he said he took it as a compliment:.....

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/03/what-scientology-investigative-reporter-does/62686/
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #69 on: April 09, 2013, 07:20:10 AM »

                                    How Scientology knows all about you

 Published on 8 Apr 2013

Scientology Inc obsessively files everything. Every report, every Ethics "chit"
every accusation, every disciplinary action and there are plenty of those.
All filed away. But their fatal flaw is using it against you once you depart.

VIDEO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuRaBMDgWZk&feature=player_embedded
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #70 on: April 12, 2013, 08:10:53 AM »

                     My good friend Kirsi was Sea Org for 20 years. (from Norway)

Kirsi departed after a sadistic RPF for 3 years.

I posted her story earlier on this thread.

She gave me permission to repost this comment she made today to my video in a private Facebook group.    Karen de la Carriere

Kirsi Ojamo
Quote:
Karen, at the FSO, after December 1996 when Lisa McPherson tragedy hit the news, OSA Flag personnel was significantly beefed up (I got transferred there from the FSO in January 1997). From that point onwards the arrival line was drafted in such a way that no public person would start a service at Flag without OSA approval. That means you had a unit of up to four OSA staff doing nothig but review Ethics, PC or OSA folders. Nothing else. These staff were / are posted in Invest and it's External Security section. In the PC folder, "Security Data" is culled and placed on top and along with the PC folder the lot is presented to OSAs review. Every single arrival, every single returning public or Outer Org Trainee. There isn't anyone at the base without OSAs knowledge of them, it isn't permitted. Does this give some flavour of OSA access? The issue of access is prevalent and sowed into the operating basis that its like asking do you have access to the fruit and vegetable section at the supermarket....you get the idea.


http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=41348&start=2325
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #71 on: April 13, 2013, 08:44:01 AM »

  John Allender:  OSA operative. sends email to scientologists in the County of Santa Clara

- Organize a false community effort

- Call peaceful protesters terrorists and vandals

- Impersonate city workers

- Terrorize!

___________________________

John Allenders email:

After months of negotiations with the County of Santa Clara the County has agreed to once again publish a flier to brief the community on the hate group known as Anonymous. The flier will include a list of Anonymous’s crimes against our churches in Santa Clara County (which is long) and a brief description of law enforcement's investigations into their illegal activities and the convictions secured against them nationally.

This flier names them as a hate group and is meant to align the people living around all of our Churches and Missions with us and to gain their cooperation to rid our community of this aberration. It is very strongly worded and should help to fill the vacuum or mystery created and answer people's question about the legitimacy of this group. The flier then goes on to directly confront the individual members of anonymous and offers them mediation to resolve their conflict.

The County, represented by Delorme McKee Stovall from the Human Relations Department will be at Los Gatos Org and Mountain View Org. at 10 am Saturday Feb 13th with some community volunteers to go door to door around our churches to hand out these fliers directly to the citizens living in each home. This will add emphasis and importance to the communication. It is unknown how many volunteers the county will be able to muster. My personal experience suggests that 10 would be a lot. This is the wrong order of magnitude.

I have discussed this with the County and told them I could round up more volunteers to help get this flier out to ensure that the community could be properly addressed. They will welcome our help.

I am asking you to volunteer 2 to 3 hours of your time on Saturday morning Feb 13th at either the Los Gatos Church or the Mountain View Church, you will be given an ID card that names you as a county employee and for those few hours you will be a county employee going door to door (in pairs) talking to residents to enlighten them about the danger of allowing this group (Anonymous) to continue to operate in their community. You won’t be going as a member of any religion but only as a concerned member of the community.

This is a very unique and important opportunity for us to gain support in our community for our religious freedom and to gain a continuing support. This is the County of Santa Clara all 2 million citizens saying, we know who you are (Anonymous), we know what you are doing and we don’t like it, please stop!

But right now that comm is only on paper in boxes and in order for it to be effective and create the agreement that is its purpose, it needs to be gotten to as many individual citizens as possible and read by them.

We can live in a society that has been told what to think about us or we can go tell the society what to think.

A couple of hundred volunteers at each Church will send a very big message to the county. The writing and publishing of this flier is done with the full knowledge and backing of the council members of Santa Clara County and the District Attorney's Office. The United States Justice Departments (FBI) representatives have been at the meetings and will be observing the anticipated Anonymous protest schedule for that same day, the San Jose City Council Members have also been briefed and some have suggested that they will be at Los Gatos Church to show their support for you and your religious freedom and to quote the San Jose Police Department “We’ve had enough of these lunatics. We will be on alert”.

Just so you are briefed, this hate group operates as freely as it does only because the society, the individual citizenry not government or police, allows it to. They carefully walk on the edge of the law by using the issue of free speech as their balancing pole. All it will take to blow them off their high wire act is for the community at large to tell them we don’t agree. The government thinks of them as either terrorists or a hate group, the police think they are vandals and criminals and know they are the ones who are breaking the law. Your DSAs have handled the government and police on these issues very effectively but the big job is society at large.

The reason that the Creek isn’t included is because 2 years ago Larry Green and Pat Wehner (the ferocious beings that they are) dispelled them of the idea of ever returning. But the Creek public need to help with this activity, this will go well for all of us or it will go bad for all of us.

There will be fliers for the Missions and we will also be addressing those communities as well but the meeting place is these two Churches.

Where: Los Gatos Church, 950 Saratoga Ave or Mountain View Church, Easy Street
Time to arrive: 9:50 am Saturday February 13th
Dress code: Upstat casual (jeans OK) with walking shoes
Approximate length of time needed 2 to 3 hours.

Bring water and a snack.


Best,
John Allender

http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?28728-Jenna-Miscavige-Hill-s-book-media-amp-reviews/page53
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #72 on: October 21, 2013, 07:27:44 AM »

                                       For New Scios OUT: How OSA flies on the Net    By Tory Magoo

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?33550-For-New-Scios-OUT-How-OSA-flies-on-the-Net
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #73 on: January 09, 2014, 07:00:12 AM »

        Court Revelation: Church Of Scientology Created Secret Files Called ‘Dead Agent Packs’ On People Who Defected From The Church

For years, there have been allegations by those who left Scientology that they faced orchestrated campaigns of blackmail and harassment by the church. Reps for the controversial group have always denied the charges, most recently saying that they “could care less” about former member Leah Remini. But new court documents exposing a never-before-seen conversation between church leader David Miscavige and his subordinates suggests that the church has in fact created the notorious “dead agent” files on departed Scientologists in the past, and that they have been used against those defectors...

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/01/scientology-secret-files-dead-agents-court-documents/
Logged
Ididntcomeback
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14442


« Reply #74 on: February 15, 2014, 07:35:23 PM »

                                      Scientology leaflet attack on Ex-Scientologist Mike Rinder

See leaflet here...

                          http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?34894-Scientology-leaflet-attack-on-Ex-Scientologist-Mike-Rinder           
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Up
Print
Jump to: